Social Construction
Social
Construction was all over in these articles, which I am sure was the point in
reading them. Hanfler says that social constructivist’s theory is “in other
word, deviance is not automatically understood as an objective fact but as
constructed and interpreted meanings that are subject to change” (13). In my
words that means that social construction is a learned belief that a society
has about a group of community of people but is able to be changed whenever the
dominate society feels it needs to be.
We saw this definition stand out in
both the Lorber and the young article. Lorber states this about gendering
“Gendering is done from birth, constantly and by everyone, we have to look not
only at the way individuals experience gender but at gender as a social
institution.” (55) Gender is a social constructed concept. We teach our young
children that this is what girls are supposed to act like and this is what guys
are supposed to act like. Guys are not to play with Barbie’s because that is a
girly thing to do. We put gender into a box and we (as a society) say that if
you are doing what the opposite gender is supposed to do you are not “correct,”
you are not performing gender correctly. “Doing gender correctly” is a social
construction that we have imposed on our young children and as they grow up
they are exposed to the same gender construction that they were introduced to
from the beginning.
I
appreciate how young says that language is also a socially constructed concept.
Young states “But don’t nobody’s language dialect, or style make them
“vulnerable to prejudice. “It’s ATTITUDES. It be the way folks with some power
perceive other people language.”” (110) This is a huge example of social
construction. Our society says if you don’t speak “standard” (which really
means the white prestige way of speaking) you are to be looked down upon and
looked as lower in education because you don’t know “how to talk”. Society
tells us what behavior is to be looked to as “good” and what is to be looked at
as “bad”.
Right
now I look at social construction as the “rules and regulations” that society
sets for us and that we tend to follow along with. I have seen this in my own
life with the dialects that Young was talking about. If someone comes up to me
saying “yo I be diggin’ you” (bad example but I have heard this), I
automatically think they are less educated than I am. This is what society is
telling me, but in reality that is not the case. As I learned in Linguistics,
every language dialect has rules and regulations it follows and all are created
equal.
I also
agree with Lorber, from the beginning we see girls are dressed in pink and boys
in blue and if that is not happening we automatically are judging those
parents. When I was younger, I used to hang out with a little boy and we used
to paint each other’s nails. Everyone always called him “gay” and I couldn’t
figure out why. It was because we were stepping outside of our socially
constructed genders which made us “other”.
I have read this article by Lorber before but every time I read it I
look back and find a different example of how socially constructed “gender” was
as I was growing up and how that became my reality today.
Hey Caitlin!
ReplyDeleteFirst of all i really enjoyed the little story at the end and how you tied what Lorber said into your own life. We used to paint my little boy cousins' nails too! I really enjoyed your post and how you incorporated both texts back to what Hanfler was saying about social construction. It really gave me a new perspective that I didn't get initially from reading the text myself. I really liked the quote you used from Young's article and then went into a story about how it played a part in your life. I can tell from this that you enjoy language and how it is perceived. You did a very nice job!
-Nicole Carver